Building on its monitoring of the progress of the Parish Council’s Biodiversity Policy, the February meeting of the council approved a prioritisation of modified objectives for 2025. Among those that ranked highest were:
ensuring the commitment to enhancing the local biodiversity in the Littleton Village Design Statement (LVDS) is vigorously pursued
continuing to advocate that the future SJMB development achieves the best biodiversity gain, including both the adoption of the Candidate SINC and for biodiversity-sensitive public access
advocating the retention of the Winchester-Littleton settlement gap
undertaking a review of the Conservation Management Plan for the Tumulus Field
ensuring the various flower beds and meadow areas under the Parish Council’s control adopt a ‘planting for biodiversity’ approach
Other notable objectives include:
enhancing the biodiversity in and around the Recreation Ground and Conservation Field (including hedges and trees, maintenance regimes and use of chemicals)
ensuring biodiversity matters are considered in the parish council’s reviews of planning applications
encouraging further volunteer involvement such as developing neighbourhood meadows and surveys at key parish locations, as well as participation in ‘citizen science’ initiatives such as the recent Big Garden Birdwatch and the Big Butterfly Count (July-Aug 2025)
Cllr David Tozer of the Parish Action on the Climate Emergency (PACE) comments: “It’s astonishing that even at parish-scale level, there are still so many opportunities to give nature a helping hand, whether that’s through tweaking our council practices or encouraging new initiatives. We’d love to hear from local residents of any initiatives they could help with or instigate.”
If interested, please contact the Parish Clerk at clerk@lhpc.org.uk.
On 12th February, Vice-Chair, David Tozer, presented the position of the Parish Council to the public meeting of the Winchester City Council (WCC) Cabinet. The Parish Council stressed three main points:
it has never opposed new housing on the existing, developed part of the Barracks site
it continues to have grave concerns that any endorsement of the Masterplan is highly premature, pending the outcome of the public examination by a planning inspector of the WCC’s own emerging local plan, that governs considerations around the site’s development (Policy W2) and the definition of the settlement gap between Winchester and Littleton (Policy NE7)
the reluctance to endorse the Candidate Site of Importance for Nature Conservation (SINC) covering the Northern Fields, a matter that the Parish Council has consistently argued strongly for
After over an hour’s discussion, the Cabinet agreed to endorse the DIO’s Concept Masterplan and to defer taking a decision on the acceptance of the Candidate SINC until after consideration of an anticipated more detailed outline planning application from the DIO.
The Parish Council is highly concerned about the deferral of the status of the Candidate SINC because it increases the likelihood of development being allowed on the Northern Fields. Additionally, an endorsement of the proposed Masterplan seems too soon, as it could conflict with any recommendations from the Local Plan Inspector.
Whilst this is disappointing, the Cabinet were at pains to make clear that the Masterplan was flexible and could only be regarded as showing a ‘direction of travel’. There is potentially still scope to modify it, which makes the imminent next round of DIO’s engagement with the local community vital (details to be announced in due course) in order to ensure as far as possible we get a development that sufficiently benefits this northern part of Winchester which is currently experiencing a variety of pressures.
The Parish Council remains concerned about the amount and type of traffic which passes through our parish. We live on the edge of a busy city where both commercial and residential building works are taking place. It’s not surprising that things are getting busier but that doesn’t mean that we just have to put our fingers in our ears – or our heads in the sand. On the one hand, it is extremely difficult to prevent traffic using roads. They form part of a national network of public highways. Yet there are actions that may help to make our experience of road use better, and the Parish Council has been exploring this for some time and on a number of fronts.
Speed indicator device on Harestock Rd
For example, we have been collecting data about vehicle speed at various points in the parish using a mobile speed indicator device. This helps us to present a case for lowering the speed limit which can improve safety and, to some extent, noise. Hampshire County Council is recommending lowering the speed limit from 40mph to 30mph on Harestock Road but needs the support of the police to do so. Strangely, if people are driving nearer to 30mph than 40mph on average, they would be more inclined to lend their support. We have also conducted a week-long survey of the traffic along Harestock Road to record volume, speed, vehicle type and peak times. Again, we are using this data to inform decision makers about the impact of traffic on the lives of residents and to make a case for some mitigation of the effects.
Over a number of years, we have explored options for improving the experiences of pedestrians, particularly along roads with no pavements in Littleton. Unfortunately, the costs of addressing this have proven too extensive. We will continue to explore options and may find opportunities associated with the development of the Sir John Moore Barracks.
Finally, the Parish Council has been meeting with those managing the Anaerobic Digester which is being built just beyond the Three Maids Hill Roundabout on the A272. Although the vast majority of their traffic will not travel through our parish, there may be times of the year when farmers will be transporting feedstock from the west, leading to tractor/trailer traffic along Harestock Road. As a result of our discussions, the company is well aware of the need to avoid this as much as possible, to consider alternative routes or methods of transportation and to provide us with information about if/when there is likely to be a short term increase in traffic. To date, there are no planned movements of this sort for 2025.
We will keep talking to the people who make decisions about roads and traffic, will ensure that our local City and County Councillors are aware of the impact of increasing volume and weights of traffic and will continue to seek ways to improve the safety and well-being of residents.
Please read the Littleton and Harestock Parish Council November e-newsletter here. Please note, the Parish Council sometimes provides links to third party websites. LHPC is not responsible for the content on the linked sites and we urge our users to be careful when clicking on any advertising that third party websites contain. Here is a link to some useful tips from Age UK for staying safe online.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.AcceptRead More
Privacy & Cookies Policy
Privacy Overview
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.